Fundamentals and meta-methodology of the diagnosis of the development of accounting science

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53641/junta.v4i2.78

Keywords:

fundamentals, meta-methodology, scientific development, accounting science

Abstract

The investigation of the fundamentals and meta-methodology of the diagnosis of the development of accounting science is an essential component to structure scientific development policies. The essential problems are: What foundations does the Diagnosis of the Development of Accounting Science have? What meta-methodological principles of evaluation does the Diagnosis of the Development of Accounting Science have? From these problems we infer its objectives: Determine the foundations of the Diagnosis of the Development of Accounting Science and Determine the meta- methodological principles of the Diagnosis of the Development of Accounting Science. The premises of the research to characterize scientific development are: (i) the epistemic approach, (ii) the semantic approach and (iii) the functional-internalist approach. The research method is the epistemic analysis method. The result of the research is the formulation of the meta-methodological principles of the diagnosis of the development of accounting science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdel-Kader, M. G. (2011). Review of management accounting research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

Bunge, M. (2015). Materia y mente: Una investigación filosófica. Pamplona, España: Laetoli.

Díez, J. A., & Moulines, C. U. (2018). Fundamentos de filosofía de la ciencia. (3era ed) Ariel Filosofía.

Houdé, O. (2003). Diccionario de ciencias cognitivas: Neurociencia, psicología, inteligencia artificial, lingüística y filosofía. Argentina, Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Laudan, L. (1986). El progreso y sus problemas: Hacia una teoría del crecimiento científico. (1era ed) España: Encuentro Ediciones.

Laudan, L. (1993). La Ciencia y el relativismo: Controversias básicas en filosofía de la ciencia. Alianza Editorial. España: Madrid

Mattessich, R. (2011). Two hundred years of accounting research an international survey of personalities, ideas and publications (from the beginning of the nineteenth century to the beginning of the twenty-first century). Londres: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Mosterin, J. (2006). Crisis de los paradigmas en el siglo XXI. (1era ed.) Lima: Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega.

Mosterín, J. (2016). Conceptos y teorías en la ciencia. (4ta ed.) Madrid: Alianza Editorial. Moulines, C. U. (1991). Pluralidad y recursión: Estudios epistemológicos. Madrid:

Alianza Editorial.

Muñoz, J., & Velarde Lombraña, J. (2000). Compendio de epistemología. (1era ed.) Madrid: Editorial Trotta.

Olivé, L. (2011). La ciencia y la tecnología en la sociedad del conocimiento ética, política y epistemología. (1era ed.) Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Zamora, J. (2013). Cuestión de protocolo: Ensayos de metodología de la ciencia. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

De la Cruz Cerrón, V. H. (2021). Fundamentals and meta-methodology of the diagnosis of the development of accounting science. La Junta Magazine, 4(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.53641/junta.v4i2.78